What it does, and does well, is translate touch into control in ways that are both simple and complex, in the right ways – simple in that setting up a layout is easy and direct – and complex in that parameters can describe not just touches and movements, but the relationships between different touches and movements. It doesn’t attempt to provide the ability to mimic a GUI. This is why I keep coming back to Konkreet Performer. On the other hand, though, what’s the point of replicating an instrument GUI? Generally speaking there will be too many controls, and they will be too functionally and ergonomically diverse to provide a fluid performance experience. And in some cases, that can add to the playability and usability of the instrument.
#CUBASE WONT RECGNIZE REAKTOR PLUGIN FULL#
I admit that there’s a certain cool factor in having a Lemur or TouchOSC template that allows full access to every parameter on a Reaktor instrument’s GUI. My experience of touch surfaces as controllers is that they shouldn’t be clones of what they’re controlling. (if this is actually someone messing with me through a Blogger security hole, well played sir, by which I mean, get a life 😉 Apologies to anyone whose votes were lost… it kept resetting to different numbers of votes. UPDATE: the built in Blogger poll is broken and I’ve switched to a widget from. Please vote and select multiple options if you use multiple touch surface apps. Hey kids, there’s a new poll on the left.
0 kommentar(er)
